Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit a4cd1671 authored by Thomas Wood's avatar Thomas Wood
Browse files

Add concurrency research page

parent cd6f3936
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
GIT GIT
remote: https://github.com/edgemaster/jekyll-scholar.git remote: https://github.com/edgemaster/jekyll-scholar.git
revision: b35ce69e6901c8f3cd46455fb600e285ea0977f4 revision: 867c1f71c4a0f76e08cceb2b2a012243c83ecceb
branch: master branch: master
specs: specs:
jekyll-scholar (5.7.0) jekyll-scholar (5.7.0)
......
...@@ -265,3 +265,7 @@ h6, .h6 { ...@@ -265,3 +265,7 @@ h6, .h6 {
.people { .people {
min-height: 280px; min-height: 280px;
} }
.post-content {
text-align: justify;
}
...@@ -535,7 +535,9 @@ Building on separation logic with concurrent abstract predicates (CAP), we intro ...@@ -535,7 +535,9 @@ Building on separation logic with concurrent abstract predicates (CAP), we intro
Month = {April}, Month = {April},
Pages = {207--231}, Pages = {207--231},
Abstract = {We present Total-TaDA, a program logic for verifying the total correctness of concurrent programs: that such programs both terminate and produce the correct result. With Total-TaDA, we can specify constraints on a thread's concurrent environment that are necessary to guarantee termination. This allows us to verify total correctness for non-blocking algorithms, e.g. a counter and a stack. Our specifications can express lock- and wait-freedom. More generally, they can express that one operation cannot impede the progress of another, a new non-blocking property we call non-impedance. Moreover, our approach is modular. We can verify the operations of a module independently, and build up modules on top of each other.} Abstract = {We present Total-TaDA, a program logic for verifying the total correctness of concurrent programs: that such programs both terminate and produce the correct result. With Total-TaDA, we can specify constraints on a thread's concurrent environment that are necessary to guarantee termination. This allows us to verify total correctness for non-blocking algorithms, e.g. a counter and a stack. Our specifications can express lock- and wait-freedom. More generally, they can express that one operation cannot impede the progress of another, a new non-blocking property we call non-impedance. Moreover, our approach is modular. We can verify the operations of a module independently, and build up modules on top of each other.},
Project = { concurrency, tada }
} }
@InProceedings{Wischik2004Strong, @InProceedings{Wischik2004Strong,
......
---
title: Concurrency
menu:
menu_order: 1
---
Concurrent programs and libraries are ubiquitous in today's world of multi-core processor architectures,
and the need for reasoning about concurrent programs and verifying their correctness grows
increasingly more important. These research problems are still considered difficult for a variety of reasons,
such as the fact that we need to consider and reach conclusions about a shared state
affected by multiple threads, or [another reason].
Our research agenda is to develop formal reasoning methods about concurrency with a focus on concurrent program logics.
Recently, various logics based on separation logic were introduced with the aim of verifying functional correctness of fine-grained concurrent programs.
We have played a significant role in the development of {% cite_details Dinsdale-Young2010Concurrent --text Concurrent Abstract Predicates %}, {% cite_details Dinsdale-Young2013Views --text Views %}, {% cite_details daRochaPinto2014TaDA --text TaDA %}, {% cite_details Raad2015CoLoSL --text CoLoSL %}, {% cite_details Ntzik2015Fault --text Fault-tolerant Concurrent Separation Logic %} and {% cite_details daRochaPinto2016Modular --text Total-TaDA %}.
These logics have tackled a range of problems, including data abstraction, atomicity abstraction, fault-tolerance, terminal, while introducing more modular and compositional ways to reason about concurrent programs.
We have applied these logics to the verification of large problems, such as data structures used in databases and java.util.concurrent, as well as the specification of file systems.
Our mission is to continually challenge and improve the state-of-the-art, targeting progress properties, specification of concurrency in POSIX filesystems, refinement of our logics so that we can deal with more advanced algorithms, and the development of automated reasoning tools based on these logics.
Recent Publications
===================
{% bibliography -q @*[project ~= concurrency] --max 5 %}
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment